Home > Douchebag Parkers > Sport Cars Are Horrible At Hide N Seek

Sport Cars Are Horrible At Hide N Seek

October 10th, 2009

Cars-Trucks-Accidents-SportCarsAreHorribleAtHideAndSeek
Submitted By: Ceiling Kat

Love Bug Douchebag Parkers , , ,

24 Responses to “Sport Cars Are Horrible At Hide N Seek”

  1. Diejestor says:

    That seems like a bit of an expensive and inaccurate shim for your building, pal.

  2. s3xt0y says:

    good riddens camaro’s suck.

  3. dono1 says:

    “That’s funny- it didn’t used to be a convertible.”

  4. James says:

    I love the guy having a staring contest with the windshield.

  5. Stefan says:

    He just needed to jack up the house to repair the foundation.

  6. Steve says:

    “A little closer, little closer…perfect.”

  7. Rhea says:

    It wasn’t until GM started taking drastic measures that everyone realized the car company was serious about phasing out Pontiac.

  8. slythorne says:

    This was an outtake from a pilot for the new KITT show, before they decided to use a Mustang instead. Here KITT is just helping to move the moonshine still for the local HUA president.

  9. americonium says:

    I can’t decide if this is the result of an idiot’s driving skills or an epic kludge. This should be on “ThereIFixedit.com” as a shed leveling device.

  10. Julie says:

    It looks like the man is trying to coax it out from under the building.
    Maybe he’s a fireman?
    “Here, kitty kitty…”

  11. toni04 says:

    @Julie
    You may be right, that is a firetruck in the background.

  12. TheAntiCat says:

    @s3xt0y
    Err, that’s a Pontiac Firebird. Camaro’s don’t have fold down lamps. Plus the quarter panels are a different shape.

  13. Espoo says:

    Toto, I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore…

  14. brett says:

    that looks like it was made in photo shop, if a car hit a building hard enough to go that far under it, it would have alot more damage, imagine hitting another car with enough force to go under it that far what it would do, that doesnt even have a cracked windshield or a scratch

  15. slythorne says:

    uh… the building was up on bricks – notice the one in the yard right in front of the Firebird?? It doesn’t take much force to knock the bricks out from underneath. As for “lack of damage”, I am sure we would see a lot more damage on the other side.

  16. auto_editor says:

    That “building” looks like nothing more than a prefab tool shed or the like, supported by nothing more exotic than a few cinder blocks on sloping ground. Drive a low-nosed wedge of a vehicle up underneath a relatively lightweight structure perched on cinder blocks and, voila! lots of “compression” damage (see the front tire’s relationship to the wheel opening) with a minimum of “impact” or conventional crunch-up damage.

  17. teamgiant says:

    “My shack!”

  18. jonathan says:

    @Diejestor
    funny thing is, the firetruck still hasn’t found him

  19. DonToby345 says:

    Here we see this particular breed of car is attempting to camouflage itself with it’s surroundings, covering itself with anyhting to hand. it may not be effective.

  20. Aaron says:

    They really should have invested in a dog to try and sniff out drugs the firebird is just not cutting it.

  21. Aaron says:

    Quick, someone pull the wicked firebird’s ruby red slippers off before her sister gets here.

  22. RICK says:

    HONEY THAT BEES NEST IS UNDER THERE, YOU WERE RIGHT!

  23. Dustin says:

    Look at me! I’m a Yuppie Mobile Home!

  24. Taboo says:

    “He’s a wwwwwreckin machine”

Leave a Reply